 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 -pair event selection criteria, the KLM trigger efficiency was
studied using
-pair event selection criteria, the KLM trigger efficiency was
studied using  -pair event samples.  .  Fig.
-pair event samples.  .  Fig. ![[*]](./icons/crossref.png) shows
track by track trigger efficiencies as functions of cos
 shows
track by track trigger efficiencies as functions of cos ,
,
 , and run number.
, and run number.
The two dips at cos  = - 0.6 and 0.9 in Fig.
 = - 0.6 and 0.9 in Fig. ![[*]](./icons/crossref.png) (a)
are caused by the KLM geometry. This is due to the chimney hole of the
superconducting solenoid around cos
 (a)
are caused by the KLM geometry. This is due to the chimney hole of the
superconducting solenoid around cos  = - 0.6.  Muon tracks
which go through the hole do not yield trigger signals.  When one
track goes through the chimney hole, the other track tends to go to
the forward end-cap region. The dip at cos
 = - 0.6.  Muon tracks
which go through the hole do not yield trigger signals.  When one
track goes through the chimney hole, the other track tends to go to
the forward end-cap region. The dip at cos  = 0.9 is caused by
tracks which go to a sector gap of forward end-cap KLM.  The cause for
the dips shown in Fig.
 = 0.9 is caused by
tracks which go to a sector gap of forward end-cap KLM.  The cause for
the dips shown in Fig. ![[*]](./icons/crossref.png) (b) is the same.  Since the
chimney hole is located around
 (b) is the same.  Since the
chimney hole is located around  = 1.2 to 1.9, the dip at this
region is directly caused by tracks which go through this region and
the dip around
 = 1.2 to 1.9, the dip at this
region is directly caused by tracks which go through this region and
the dip around  = - 1.5 is caused by the other tracks of
 = - 1.5 is caused by the other tracks of
 -pairs.
-pairs.
Except for this geometrical effect, the trigger efficiency is kept
about 98% in average.  Fig. ![[*]](./icons/crossref.png) (c) shows the long term
stability of the KLM trigger efficiency from Jan. 2000 to
Jun. 2000. Most of this period, the trigger efficiency has been kept
above 97.5% and its fluctuation has been within statistical errors.
 (c) shows the long term
stability of the KLM trigger efficiency from Jan. 2000 to
Jun. 2000. Most of this period, the trigger efficiency has been kept
above 97.5% and its fluctuation has been within statistical errors.
 
 
 
 
 
 
